Monday, March 30, 2009

Tangled Up In Bob


So, since Jeff has obviously spent a considerable amount of time cataloging his Dylan experiences for us, I feel a little obligated to add my two cents to the massive piggy bank that is Jeff's Dylan knowledge. (Advance apologies to my fiancee). As I commented on Jeff's recent post, I own the following Dylan albums:
*Best of Bob Dylan I
*Blonde on Blonde
*Blood on the Tracks
*Bringing It All Back Home
*Desire
*Highway 61 Revisited
*Love and Theft
*Nashville Skyline
*Rolling Thunder Revue (live album)
*Royal Albert Hall Concert (live album)
*Time Out of Mind
*assorted singles: My Back Pages (from "Dylan"), Girl From the North Country (from "The Freewheelin'"), Step It Up and Go (from "Good As I Been To You"), and Wigwam (from the Royal Tenenbaums Soundtrack).

As you can see, I have accumulated mostly his more popular albums. And rarely have I listened even to those thoroughly (mostly at the insistence of my aforementioned fiancee), so it is difficult for me to accurately assess any favorite albums. A perfunctory glance at my star ratings for individual songs on iTunes reveals that Blonde on Blonde, Nashville Skyline, Blood on The Tracks and Bringing It All Back Home would be at the top (not including "Best of"). I think my individual song ratings would be of more interest to you, so I'll take you down some of those I've "starred" at some point over the last several years. Caveat: I've really just gone along over the years at different times and starred things mostly based on wanting them to appear in my "Party Shuffle" playlist more often, so the following ratings were not determined on any kind of uniform scale or in a balanced state of mind.

Five Stars
*Don't Think Twice, It's All Right
*Stuck Inside of Mobile With The Memphis Blues Again
*My Back Pages
*Like A Rolling Stone

Four Stars
*Mr. Tambourine Man
*Tangled Up In Blue
*Just Like A Woman
*Simple Twist Of Fate
*Shelter From The Storm
*Girl From The North Country (ft. Johnny Cash)
*Tonight I'll Be Staying Here With You

Three Stars
*Blowin' In The Wind
*I Threw It All Away

Two Stars
*The Times Are a-Changin'
*Lay Lady Lay
*Knockin' on Heaven's Door
*Rainy Day Women #12 & 35
*Subterranean Homesick Blues
*It's All Over Now, Baby Blue
*Hurricane

In retrospect, it would appear that I prefer my Dylan acoustic, unadorned, mellow and ponderous. I also should note that three Dylan songs appear on my "Fall Mix" playlist, which is by far my most-listened to mix: Tonight I'll Be Staying Here With You, The Times They Are a-Changin', and My Back Pages. I would also add, in sum, that My Back Pages, Like A Rolling Stone, Tangled Up In Blue and Simple Twist of Fate would be on my all-time best songs ever. They're just incredible.

*Image Credit goes to NARA via wikipedia.

Thursday, March 26, 2009

Still LOST



It's really incredible how I went from never having seen LOST when I moved to Virginia about 7 months ago to now planning most of my week around the new episodes airing at 9 p.m. (ET) on Wednesdays. If you remember, after polishing off the first season DVDs while I was still cable-less, I wrote up some quick thoughts about the show here.

As you probably know from reading some of my previous posts, I made my way through the second, third and fourth seasons (online and on DVD), with plenty of time to spare before the beginning of the fifth season (currently airing). We're a little over halfway done with the season, and I thought back the other day on how far the show has come since its initial season. For those of you who don't watch the show, here's a video ABC created for people in your situation who thought they might want to give this season a shot. It basically takes you through the first four seasons in five minutes. Of course, just through the 10 or so episodes already aired this season, the story has morphed an incredible amount just from where that video leaves off, so if you want to try to pick up the show now, you'd have to at least watch this season's episodes online.

I'll summarize the seasons in another way here (Warning, I'll include a lot of embedded links to info about the show that will act as spoilers to people who've never seen the show):

-Season One, as I described in the earlier post, mostly focuses on the plane crash survivors struggle to survive on a desert isle, with some supernatural elements peeking through. But mostly, the action is contained to interpersonal drama and the occasional idiotic venture into the mystery of nature. In the literary realm of conflict types (what we were taught in elementary school as five types, now apparently expanded to 6, to include man vs. machine/technology), the season mostly falls into man vs. nature (survival), with some man vs. self and man vs. man thrown in (human drama), with just a sprinkling of man vs. supernatural/fate.

-Season Two picks up with the discovery of the Hatch, an underground bunker, equipped with all imaginable human amenities, in which a mysterious Aussie named Desmond has been living alone for about three years. Desmond's sole purpose, we learn, is to enter a series of six numbers into an old computer every 108 minutes, vaguely believing that doing so keeps the world from ending. This hits home one of the main thematic arcs of the show, faith vs. science/logic. There is no logical reason to believe that pushing the button, as it's called, does anything but reset a strange-looking 108-minute clock, but some characters believe that it is their destiny, and faithfully execute the task. Also, we are introduced to a set of survivors from the other section of the plane, who have fared far less well in staying alive as a group. We're caught up on their story very quickly, and also learn more about The Others, a group of people living on/near the Island who were introduced at the very end of the first season in kidnapping one of the survivors. In sum, the overarching conflict shifts from survival to a man vs. supernatural, with a sparking man vs. man/group in the beginnings of serious conflict with The Others.

-Season 3 expands to show us the world of The Others, and sheds more light on the Mysterious Dharma Initiative, the scientific research group that previously inhabited the Island and to whom we owe the Hatch and some of the other mysterious aspects of The Island. In this way, the story shifts more clearly to a man vs. man/group conflict as we see the Others and the survivors interact more with each other. Also introduced at the end of the season are another group of people from off the Island who come on a freighter.

-Season 4 literally blows the cover off the storyline to that point. We discover the freighter folks are not there to rescue, but rather kill, the people on the Island, with cloudy motivations. We see lots of man vs. man conflict in violence among the Survivors, the Others, and the Freighter Folks. Finally, it is seen as a struggle to get off the island for many people, and really investigates the concept of time travel and how it might fit into the overall arc of the show. The main takeaway is that some of the survivors do succeed in getting off the Island, after much struggle.

-Season 5 has been described by the shows creators as the counter to season 4, in that its latter part has mostly been concerned with those who got off the Island returning to it (again, with cloudy motivations). Trying to so is understandably complex, and we follow those who were left behind through some incredibly mind-exploding (literally, in some cases) time traveling experiences. At this current juncture, they are back to the Island, though apparently existing in more than 1 time period. Most of the main characters are living in the 1970s Dharma Initiative, while some others apparently exist on the Island in some unknown present (2007 or 2008).

I'm sure that was very confusing and disjointed, but hopefully mostly accurate. The main point of this post is to examine the progression of types of conflict and how the storyline has expanded into other realms with each season. The progression I just outlined seems to me to make sense when one examines the possibilities for a show featuring the basic premise of landing on a desert isle. Of course, the most immediate conflict is survival, and that takes up most of the first season. But that conflict quickly becomes unsustainable in terms of entertainment. Cast Away, which almost exclusively features Tom Hanks surviving alone on a desert isle, was a pretty long and decent movie, but there’s no way it could have been made into a popular serial TV show. People need interpersonal conflict to remain entertained.

To fill that need, it’s almost inevitable that new characters must be introduced. Predictably, in Season 2, we learn that the Survivors are not alone on the Island (i.e. Desmond and the Others). This type of leap would normally signal a downturn in a show's quality. But conversely, in LOST’s case, it increased. This was possible, I believe, by strongly relying on the sci-fi or just plain weird aspects of the Hatch. The science vs. fate theme worked well, and it really opened the door to become hooked on the show's overarching mythology.

Season 3, then must go a step further, and really lambaste us with new people and new conflicts. Predictably, this was a tipping point for many viewers to stop watching. The idea that an entire colony of sophisticated people has been living mysteriously and largely unnoticed right next to the survivors was just too much to take - too trite - for many people. Again, I think it is the deft and steady unveiling of the Island's history and mythology that keeps the show from unraveling at the seams at this point.

Pushing further, the conflict between peoples on the isle becomes unsustainable as well, so an entire deluge of off-island characters are introduced, along with a lot more violence and explosions. This was, I think, another tipping point for many folks who were fans of the show and its mythology, a total cop out in many's views. I think the larger forward-moving action push to get the characters off the island is what sustains the season.

In season five, the parallel journeys over 3 years of the folks trying to get back and those who were left behind took up most of the first few episodes. Now that those who left have returned, and the various conflicts introduced at different times (both in and out of the show's reality) are coming together to guide us toward the show's final next season, the show is maintaining the momentum necessary to carry it to the last season. All the human, sci-fi, fate, and man vs. man conflicts are coming to a head, and I'm hooked. Possible ends are in sight, and I'm in for the long haul.

In sum, I'll say my favorite season was season 2. Taking what could be seen as a completely ludicrous notion that a man has been living underneath the survivors and making it intriguing was a skillful maneuver by the show’s producers. It was bizarre, philosophical, and a complete departure from what is normally seen on TV. At a time when even TV’s last refuge for science fiction fans, the Sci-Fi channel (which does show LOST reruns), is selling out to try to broaden its appeal, such a move was risky, and it paid off well. Also a fitting description for the entire show, I suppose.

Monday, March 23, 2009

Mad' Scientist?

Here is the latest issue of Madison Scholar, JMU's online scholarly news publication. Apparently, only two stories by me are in this one. Also a video sidebar I did. It's pretty sweet. This is just good ol' web browsing, none of that new-school, fancy-schmansy Virtual Paper crap.

p.s. I think that's the first time I've ever tried to spell "schmansy." Not recognized in the blogger lexicon, so feel free to offer alternate spellings as per your preference.

Wednesday, March 18, 2009

Madison Magazine

Check out the latest issue of Madison Magazine here (scroll to bottom of page for launch link). I've got a few stories in it, and a writer bio in the front! Not really that exciting. Prepare to be blown away by the majesty of Virtual Paper...

Saturday, March 14, 2009

Excitement!

Mostly in yielding to Jeff's prodding, I have decided to post another enlightening and exciting blog. But I'm warning you, you'll be much better off scouring facebook and YouTube for all the pics and videos depicting wild and lascivious tomfoolery that undoubtedly are being posted this instant by thousands of college kids, just hours after they've returned from SPRING BREAK!

Such as these.

HAHAHA! You've just been SPRING ROLLED!

Ok that was fairly lame, but seriously, I just checked facebook and have already been notified by the new non-stop news feed that hundreds of spring break pics from lots of idiots have been posted mere hours after their status feeds let me know they were home safely from Cancun, Daytona, Acapulco, Morocco, Djibouti, etc.

Certainly their weeks have been more exciting than mine. The past few days for me have consisted mostly of trying to use the Commonwealth of Virginia's tax Web site, which is one of the worst sites of any kind in navigation/functionality I've ever visited, and fighting with my printer, which I'm sure is possessed by some kid of Poltergeist.

More enjoyably, I finished Malcolm Gladwell's Blink, which actually is very good. Up to this point, I've resisted reading anything by the afro-wearing diminutive journalist-turned-pop sociologist. Mostly, I must admit, because I have been afraid it might make me consider myself unorignal. You see, he is much of what I'd like to be, doing much of what I like to imagine myself doing. For years, I have been sitting back and offering armchair psycho-social analysis of people, cultural phenomena and current events, my views being mostly formed from knowledge other people (like researchers) attained and passed down to me directly or indirectly, filtered through my own creative and observing lens. A lot of what I do as part of a PR team and what I did as a reporter is take lots of information going in lots of different directions and try to synthesize it into a larger, connected, overall picture.

That is precisely what Gladwell does (extremely well) in Blink, his target being the human subconscious mind. He tells stories as far ranging as the NY Getty Museum's science-vs.-intuition battle in determining whether or not their great Kouros Statue was a fake to a psychological researcher who intuitively knows the psycho-social interaction that is vital to successful marriages so well that he can predict whether or not a couple will divorce withing 10 years with 95 percent accuracy after listening to just a few seconds of tape of them talking, to the tale of Amadou Diallo, the man whose unprovoked killing by four NY cops spurred debates over proper police training and racial profiling and even a song by The Boss himself.

Gladwell expands the idea to include a War Games fiasco conducted by the U.S. Government in the early 2000s, how subtle changes in product packaging can drastically affect their sales, the 1990s Pepsi Challenge and even the real reason why the number of women in professional symphony orchestras has increased from 5 percent to nearly 50 over the last decade or so.

It's a quick and fascinating read, and I'm afraid I'm now hooked. I'll probably wait for the Tipping Point until Sarah K. is done with it, so I'll probably move next to Outliers.

In other reading, I'm finding my latest attempt to get through Catch-22 similarly snagged as in previous ones. I'm about halfway through, the furthest I've ever made it, but having at the start found Heller's whimsical wordplay pleasant, it is now grating and repetitive. The passages are too windy and winding, and there's not enough action. A little like this post, I suppose.

Thursday, March 5, 2009

The Fax



Here's a neat post from Rich Miller's Capitol Fax Blog, which you may recognize from columns being run in the South County News. Based on a State Journal-Register column about Gary Hannig's wife being considered as his replacement in the IL House, Miller poses the question should the Assembly pass a bill forbidding the appointment of political spouses/family members to fill seats.

I vote no. Macoupin's current State Senator, Deanna Demuzio, was appointed to fill her late husband's seat, and she has proven herself a capable successor. Sure, currently there is a chance that unqualified family members may be "given" posts based on patronage, but it's just as likely that friends of current politicians are appointed to those seats, and there's no way to pass a law to ban that, so the idea just seems a little silly to me and unfair to potentially good candidates who also happen to be family members of current politicians. Thoughts?

CREDIT: This information came to me from my lovely fiancee, Sarah, pictured above right.

Monday, March 2, 2009

Nice Memorial

I don't know who already knows of this, but this is the first I've heard of it. Thank you, Sarah K., for letting me know. Sen. Deanna Demuzio graciously introduced a bill to mourn the loss of Grampa A., which was accepted as a resolution by the IL General Assembly. There should be a formal certificate issued soon, if it has not been sent already, but in any case, here is the text of the bill on the GA Web site. Very thoughtful.